Skip to main content
Overview

Dr Istvan Praet

Assistant Professor


Affiliations
Affiliation
Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology

Research interests

  • Broadly speaking I am interested in the question of modernity and in the workings of modern forms of thought and of the modern sciences in particular. This may seem like an impossibly diffuse subject at first glance. For good reasons, many scholars prefer to speak of "multiple modernities" these days, emphasising modernity's protean character and its global spread beyond the confines of its supposed (European) region of birth. But what fascinates me personally more is that modern forms of thought are also astonishingly uniform the world over. We, moderns, all believe in outer space, for example, but none of us believes in outer time. And that belief colours how we understand, among other things, history and biology. The Hellenic world is typically framed as an ancient civilisation, not as an alien civilisation. In a similar vein, dinosaurs are conventionally viewed as ancient lifeforms, not as alien lifeforms. My anthropological research with astrobiologists and planetary scientists shows that such deeply ingrained views are much less self-evident than we assume and are in fact rooted in metaphysical conventions that go themselves back to the roots of modernity itself.
  • Examining the conceptual underpinnings of modern forms of thought – including scientific research, political ecology and environmentalism – is crucial in my view because they eminently shape how contemporary world affairs are imagined. Many of our perplexities regarding the rise of neofascism, the proliferation of conspiracy theories and mirror worlds, the advent of climate sceptics and all sorts of merchants of doubt, the apparently widespread loss of trust in science, or the worldwide absence of truly decisive climate action may well dissipate if anthropologists manage to frame those questions in other-than-modern terms. My working hypothesis, in other words, is that we, new arrivals in the Anthropocene, have reached a point where modernity stunts our political, ecological and scientific imaginations. What if the uneasy sense of “disorientation” that many ecologically-minded observers admit to these days is as much self-imposed, i.e. by our inability to extract ourselves from our modern ways of looking, as it is caused by the actual state of the world?

Publications

Authored book

Chapter in book

Edited book

Journal Article

Other (Print)