Staff profile
Professor Emma Cave
Professor of Healthcare Law
| Affiliation | Telephone |
|---|---|
| Professor of Healthcare Law in the Durham Law School | +44 (0) 191 33 42829 |
| Director in the Durham CELLS (Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences) | |
| Fellow of the Institute for Medical Humanities | |
| Fellow of the Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing |
Biography
Emma Cave is a Professor of Healthcare Law, legal scholar and Director of the Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences. She works on emerging biotechnologies and legal aspects of medical treatment. Interdisciplinary in approach, her work bridges science and its clinical application. She has worked alongside health professionals, scientists, philosophers, sociologists and economists and with policy-makers, professional regulators, think-tanks and Parliamentarians.
Legal aspects of medical treatment
Past research projects have examined the medical treatment of critically ill children, the adequacy of ethical advice in the COVID-19 pandemic (funded by the British Academy) and the implications of the Supreme Court judgment Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] on informed consent (funded by the ESRC IAA). She held a Scottish Parliament Academic Fellowship to produce a Scottish Parliament Information Centre Briefing on information consent. Much of her specialist advice focuses on translating this research beyond academia.
Advisory roles
She has advised the House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee as a core member of their Independent Expert Panel on transition from child to adult care (2026), palliative care (2026), patient safety (2025), pharmacy (2024) and digitisation of the NHS (2023). She has informed public inquiries as a member of the ethics advisory group to the COVID-19 Inquiry (2024-6) and as a co-convenor of the medical ethics report to the Infected Blood Inquiry in 2020. She has contributed on multiple occasions to professional guidance, chairing the GMC's Good Medical Practice Advisory Forum (2022-23), serving on the BMA's Medical Ethics Committee (from 2024 to present) and as working group member producing guidance on Genetic Testing in Childhood and involvement of the police following abortion.
Regulating emerging biotechnologies
She has a longstanding interest in the ethical and regulatory challenges raised by emerging biotechnologies, particularly where scientific innovation tests established legal categories and governance frameworks. She was a member of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2018-21) where she was Deputy Chair of the Statutory Approvals Committee. She chaired the Nuffield Council on Bioethics working group on Stem Cell-Based Embryo Models (2024-25) and subsequently sat on their working group on the 14-Day Rule for Human Embryo Culture. Her approach emphasises proportionate, transparent and publicly accountable regulation, attentive both to scientific potential and to the ethical limits of permissible research.
Research interests
- Health law
- Particularly consent, capacity and compulsion
Esteem Indicators
- 2024: Chair of Nuffield Council on Bioethics Working Group on Stem Cell-Based Embryo Models: The Nuffield Council on Bioethics (NCOB) has started a rapid review project to assess and advise on the ethical and regulatory issues raised by research using human stem cell-based embryo models
- 2023 - 2026: Member of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry Ethics Advisory Group: The UK Covid-19 Inquiry has announced the creation of an independent Ethics Advisory Group to ensure its UK-wide listening exercise, Every Story Matters, maintains the highest ethical standards. The Group, with expertise in social research ethics and practice, provides an independent review of the design and approach of Every Story Matters and is chaired by David Archard, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at Queen’s University Belfast.
- 2022: Core member of the Health and Social Care Committee's Expert Panel: The Health and Social Care Committee is a Select Committee of the House of Commons. It has established an Expert Panel to support its work by issuing independent evaluations on specific areas such as Digital Transformation in the NHS (2022) and Pharmacy Services (2023). I am one of the core members, appointed in 2022. For each evaluation additional members with specific expertise join the panel.
- 2021 - 2023: Chair of the General Medical Council's Good Medical Practice Advisory Forum: The GMC is the independent regulator for medical professionals. The GMC's core guidance, Good Medical Practice, sets out the standards of patient care and professional behaviour expected of all medical professionals registered with the GMC. GMP was last reviewed in 2013. To help the GMC review GMP, an advisory forum was set up comprising 12 experts from outside of the GMC. We met several times over the review period to guide the GMC on specific aspects of the review. A public consultation was held in 2022 and then the new guidance was published in 2023, coming into force in 2024.
- 2020 - 2023: Co-Convenor of Medical Ethics Group report to the Infected Blood Inquiry: The Infected Blood Inquiry is an independent public statutory Inquiry established to examine the circumstances in which men, women and children treated by national Health Services in the United Kingdom were given infected blood and infected blood products, in particular since 1970. The 130 pp Medical Ethics expert report was published in April 2020. It discusses the ethical principles that should govern and inform clinical decision-making. It was commissioned primarily to inform the Inquiry’s questioning of clinicians in future hearings. The report is based on letters of instruction given to the Group by the Inquiry which had input from core participants. Many of the questions and responses relate to general medical ethics and are not necessarily specific to issues of infected blood and blood products, hepatitis, HIV or blood and bleeding disorders.
- 2018 - 2021: Member of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and Deputy Chair of the Statutory Approvals Committee: The HFEA is the UK’s independent regulator of fertility treatment and research using human embryos. A world-class expert organisation in the fertility sector, the HFEA was the first statutory body of this type in the world. The Statutory Approvals Committee decides what conditions can be tested for using a type of embryo screening called Pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and considers applications for mitochondrial donation treatment and Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) tissue typing. It also issues ‘special directions’, which are rules we can issue to clinics to govern how they import or export sperm, eggs, or embryos or use a new fertility treatment or technique.
- 2017: Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Authority:
- 2013: Fellow of the Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing:
- 2013: Member of the Society of Legal Scholars:
Publications
Authored book
- Medicine, Patients and the LawBrazier, M., Cave, E., & Heywood, R. (2023). Medicine, Patients and the Law. MUP.
Chapter in book
- Making Reproductive Subjects Visible: The Role and Limits of ConsentCave, E. (in press). Making Reproductive Subjects Visible: The Role and Limits of Consent. In S. Halliday, R. Brione, & J. Nicholls (Eds.), Narratives of Consent and Reproductive Subjects: Tales of Invisibility. Routledge.
- Adolescent consent to treatment for gender dysphoria in England and WalesCave, E. (in press). Adolescent consent to treatment for gender dysphoria in England and Wales. In J. Miola & L. Austin (Eds.), Research Handbook on Medical Consent. Edward Elgar.
- Teenage decision making and the law in England and WalesCave, E. (2026). Teenage decision making and the law in England and Wales. In J. Brierley, S. Blackburn, & D. Archard (Eds.), Great Ormond Street Hospital Textbook of Paediatric Bioethics and Law. Oxford University Press.
- A Future Orientated View of AutonomyCave, E. (2025). A Future Orientated View of Autonomy. In L. Forsberg, I. Black, & A. Skelton (Eds.), Consenting Children: Autonomy, Well-being, Responsibility (pp. 136-152). British Academy.
- The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology (1984)Cave, E. (2023). The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology (1984). In S. Fovargue & C. Purshouse (Eds.), Leading Works in Health Law and Ethics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146612-6
Journal Article
- The Value of Public Inquiries, Ethical Accountability, and Patient Voices: Reflections on the Infected Blood InquiryGorman, R., Smith, C., Farsides, B., & Cave, E. (2026). The Value of Public Inquiries, Ethical Accountability, and Patient Voices: Reflections on the Infected Blood Inquiry. Haemophilia. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70296
- Human stem cell-based embryo models: innovation, ethics, and policyMartinez Arias, A., Rivron, N., Tajbakhsh, S., Johnston, J., Alev, C., Bally-Cuif, L., Böke, E., Cavazza, T., Cave, E., Cyranoski, D., David, L., Esteban, M. A., Fu, J., Geijsen, N., de Graeff, N., Hanna, J. H., Hopwood, N., Inamdar, M. S., Lanner, F., … Yu, L. (2026). Human stem cell-based embryo models: innovation, ethics, and policy. Human Reproduction. Advance online publication, Article deag035. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deag035
- Last Resort as a Justification for Compulsory Nasogastric Tube Feeding of Adults with Anorexia NervosaCave, E., & Jenkins, R. (2026). Last Resort as a Justification for Compulsory Nasogastric Tube Feeding of Adults with Anorexia Nervosa. Medical Law International. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332261424924
- 50 Years of the Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976: A Spent Statute?Craig, P., & Cave, E. (2026). 50 Years of the Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act 1976: A Spent Statute? Medical Law Review, 34(1), Article fwag003. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwag003
- What’s in a Name? Abbasi and Another v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Haastrup v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2025] UKSC 15Jeyaraj, R., Cave, E., Archard, D., & Brierley, J. (2026). What’s in a Name? Abbasi and Another v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Haastrup v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2025] UKSC 15. Medical Law Review, 34(1), Article fwaf047. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwaf047
- Legal decisions on longstanding severe eating disordersTan, J., Cave, E., Keene, A. R., Kern, N., Bradshaw, A., Griffiths, J., Jenkins, R., & Robinson, P. (2025). Legal decisions on longstanding severe eating disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10490
- Legal decisions on longstanding severe eating disordersTan, J., Cave, E., Ruck Keene, A., Kern, N., Bradshaw, A., Griffiths, J., Jenkins, R., & Robinson, P. (2025). Legal decisions on longstanding severe eating disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10490
- Evolving Judicial Approaches to Longstanding Anorexia NervosaCave, E., & Tan, J. (2025). Evolving Judicial Approaches to Longstanding Anorexia Nervosa. Clinical Ethics, 20(4), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509251391973
- Advocating distinct regulatory paths for embryos and embryo-like structuresCave, E. (2025). Advocating distinct regulatory paths for embryos and embryo-like structures. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 12(1), Article lsaf008. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaf008
- The infected blood scandal: lessons for clinical research.Cave, E., & Farsides, B. (2024). The infected blood scandal: lessons for clinical research. BMJ, 385, Article q1205. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q1205
- Liability For Rugby Related Neuro-Degenerative Disease: A Question of TortCave, E., Purshouse, C., & Purshouse, J. (2024). Liability For Rugby Related Neuro-Degenerative Disease: A Question of Tort. Journal of Personal Injury Law, 2, 93-112.
- How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement.Archard, D., Cave, E., & Brierley, J. (2024). How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement. Medical Law Review, 32(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad040
- Involving parents in paediatric clinical ethics committee deliberations: a current controversyBrierley, J., Archard, D., & Cave, E. (2023). Involving parents in paediatric clinical ethics committee deliberations: a current controversy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 49(11), 733-736. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108460
- Skeleton Keys to Hospital Doors: Adolescent Adults who Refuse Life-Sustaining Medical TreatmentCave, E., & Cave, H. (2023). Skeleton Keys to Hospital Doors: Adolescent Adults who Refuse Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment. Modern Law Review, 86(4), 984-1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12798
- Nasogastric tube feeding under physical restraint on paediatric wards: ethical, legal and practical considerations regarding this lifesaving interventionFuller, S. J., Chapman, S., Cave, E., Druce-Perkins, J., Daniels, P., & Tan, J. (2023). Nasogastric tube feeding under physical restraint on paediatric wards: ethical, legal and practical considerations regarding this lifesaving intervention. BJPsych Bulletin, 47(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.11
- Should states restrict recipient choice amongst relevant and available COVID-19 vaccines?Cave, E., & McMahon, A. (2023). Should states restrict recipient choice amongst relevant and available COVID-19 vaccines? Medical Law Review, 31(2), 272-292. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwac042
- Clinical ethics support services during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a cross-sectional surveyDittborn, M., Cave, E., & Archard, D. (2022). Clinical ethics support services during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(10), 695-701. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107818
Other (Digital/Visual Media)
- Futureproofing ethical SCBEM innovationCave, E. (2024, December 2). Futureproofing ethical SCBEM innovation. BioNews [Blog Post].
- How can we regulate embryo model research without stifling it?Cave, E. (2024, August 30). How can we regulate embryo model research without stifling it? [Blog Post]
Report
- Evaluation of Palliative care in England, HC 632Health and Social Care Committee Independent Expert Panel. (2025). Evaluation of Palliative care in England, HC 632. House of Commons.
- Human stem cell-based embryo models: A review of ethical and governance questionsHuman stem cell-based embryo models: A review of ethical and governance questions. (2024). Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
- Evaluation of the Government’s progress on meeting patient safety recommendations. HC 362Health and Social Care Committee Independent Expert Panel. (2024). Evaluation of the Government’s progress on meeting patient safety recommendations. HC 362. UK Parliament.
- Evaluation of the Government’s commitments in the area of pharmacy in England. HC1310Health and Social Care Committee Independent Expert Panel. (2024). Evaluation of the Government’s commitments in the area of pharmacy in England. HC1310. UK Parliament.
- Evaluation of Government Commitments made on the digitisation of the NHS. HC 780Health and Social Care Committee Independent Expert Panel. (2023). Evaluation of Government Commitments made on the digitisation of the NHS. HC 780. UK Parliament.
- Expert Report to the Infected Blood Inquiry: Medical EthicsCave, E., Farsides, B., Kazarian, M., Kerridge, I., & Savulescu, J. (2020). Expert Report to the Infected Blood Inquiry: Medical Ethics. Infected Blood Inquiry.