Skip to main content

Comparison of Hunga Tonga & Hunga Ha'apai on December 8th, 2021 and January 17th, 2022

Professor Claire Horwell, from our Earth Sciences Department, explores the health risks of ash following the eruption of the underwater volcano Hunga Tonga–Hunga Haʻapai, near Tonga.

Are there health concerns about people inhaling volcanic ash? How might that differ from situations such as breathing wildfire smoke?

When volcanic ash starts to fall, it can look a bit like snow, but actually it is made of tiny particles of rock. Some of the particles are sand-sized, but others are more like flour—it’s these small particles that can be breathed into the lungs.

People have an idea that these rock particles are glassy and sharp and may cut the lungs when you breathe them in. They are right that the ash contains volcanic glass (solidified magma), but at the tiny size of these particles, they are not sharp. They’re a bit angular, but they won’t lacerate you.

Ash is different from wildfire smoke because it is made from rock and not combusted vegetation. Wood smoke is more uniformly fine-grained than volcanic ash, so it tends to stay airborne rather than settling. It has been shown to be quite toxic, whereas both laboratory and clinical studies on volcanic ash have not shown it to be particularly harmful. Having said that, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has said that all particulate matter (PM) can cause respiratory disease—and there’s evidence of PM affecting every organ in the body, so it is sensible to be cautious and to try to limit exposure.

Most healthy people can tolerate breathing even quite high concentrations of ash for a while. They might find it irritating—it may give you a sore throat and a cough, and it may give you itchy skin and sore eyes. We are more concerned about people with existing respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. They may find that their conditions worsen, and they should make sure they keep their medication with them, use it as prescribed and get medical support if they are experiencing troubling symptoms, such as wheezing and shortness of breath.

There is some concern that people could develop serious lung diseases from inhaling ash, but there is almost no medical evidence for this. This is mainly because people are not usually exposed to enough ash, or for long enough, to trigger the diseases. Luckily Tonga receives around 1.5 meters of rainfall a year, so we are hopeful that ash will be quickly washed away and exposure will be short, even if the volcano continues to erupt for a while.
 
Also, some minerals in ash may be more toxic than others. People are concerned about crystalline silica because it is a carcinogen and can cause a scarring lung disease called silicosis. But we have shown that there are good reasons why volcanic silica may not be able to trigger these diseases, and clinical studies—albeit a limited number—around the world have failed to find outbreaks of such diseases. The ash from Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha Ľapai is not expected to contain much crystalline silica: the magma erupted from the volcano hasn’t got the right composition (it is “andesitic” or “basaltic andesitic,” so [there is] not enough silicon dioxide), and the eruption style also wasn’t conducive to its formation.

Usually in eruptions, the ash is a minor health concern compared to the far greater public health issues related to provision of clean water, sanitation and prevention of disease outbreaks in evacuation shelters.

How should people protect themselves from inhaling volcanic ash?

People should reduce their exposure to ash by staying indoors and closing doors and windows. This can be challenging in tropical climates such as in Tonga, where buildings may be designed to be highly ventilated. People can use plastic sheeting or bed sheets to cover large openings, but it’s important that the inside environment doesn’t get dangerously hot.

When people have to go outdoors—people will need to be cleaning up after the disaster, going to work, school, et cetera—they can lessen their exposure to ash by wearing effective face masks. They may also need to wear them indoors if the ash got inside the home, and they need to clean it up.

We conducted a study on the effectiveness of different kinds of face coverings and masks for protection from volcanic ash. We found that—just like protecting yourself from COVID-19, wood smoke and any other aerosol or particulate—the best kinds of masks were the certified respirators (N95, FFP2 or P2, depending on your location) because of the excellent filtration of the nonwoven material that they’re made from and their close fit to the face. Surgical masks performed pretty well, too, but they’re not designed to fit to your face, so they provide less protection overall. Cloth performed really poorly in our experiments.

If you can only get hold of a surgical mask, you can tie a piece of cloth over the top to hold it better to your face. And if you only have cloth, try folding it into several layers. That will improve its filtration a little. Some agencies recommend wetting masks, but we found no advantage to that, and sometimes it made the filtration worse.

Read the full article at Scientific American

Find out more

Find out more

Image credit: Pierre Markuse via Flickr. Used under Creative Commons licence